Once a First Information Report (FIR) is lodged or a complaint is filed, the police are responsible for investigating the alleged offence, collecting evidence, recording statements and submitting the appropriate report to the court. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, provides the legal framework for these responsibilities. However, investigations in Bangladesh may continue for months and, in some cases, years. Until the necessary report is submitted and the case is ready to proceed, judicial proceedings may be significantly delayed, leaving both victims and accused persons in prolonged uncertainty. One major concern is the delay in completing investigations and submitting reports. Investigating officers often handle multiple cases alongside law-and-order duties and other official responsibilities, leaving limited time for thorough investigation. Such delays prolong uncertainty for victims and may result in extended pretrial detention for accused persons. Beyond procedural inefficiency, these delays undermine individual rights and public confidence in the justice system.

Secondly, the improper collection and preservation of evidence constitute another major concern. Inadequate crime-scene management, mishandling of physical evidence and delays in obtaining medical and forensic reports can compromise the integrity of an investigation. Limited laboratory facilities, shortages of trained personnel and inadequate equipment further hinder the timely analysis of crucial evidence. These deficiencies may weaken the prosecution’s case and undermine the court’s ability to determine the truth, allowing cases to fail because of investigative shortcomings rather than a lack of evidence of the offence.

The third challenge is the delay in securing witness attendance and commencing trial. Even after an investigation is completed and the police report is submitted, proceedings may be postponed because summonses are not properly served or witnesses fail to appear. Some witnesses become discouraged by repeated court appearances, while others relocate, forget important details or face pressure to withdraw their testimony. The absence of police witnesses can also result in further adjournments. As time passes, memories become less reliable and testimony may lose its evidential value. These difficulties can weaken the prosecution and make it harder for the court to determine the facts accurately.

These challenges are interrelated and collectively undermine the effectiveness of criminal proceedings. Delays in investigation may compromise evidence, while evidentiary deficiencies and difficulties in securing witness testimony can further prolong trials. Such delays undermine both the efficiency and fairness of the justice system. Victims may be deprived of timely justice, while accused persons, particularly those in custody, may endure prolonged uncertainty and detention. An effective criminal justice system must therefore ensure accountability for offenders while safeguarding the rights of accused persons and upholding the principle of a fair and timely trial.The issue of delayed justice cannot be attributed solely to the judiciary. Courts are dependent on the timely submission of investigation reports, reliable evidence and the availability of witnesses to adjudicate cases effectively. Incomplete investigations and evidentiary deficiencies inevitably impede the timely and proper disposal of criminal cases. Accordingly, the roles and responsibilities of investigating officers and prosecutors must be given equal consideration in any comprehensive reform of the criminal justice system. Addressing these shortcomings requires targeted institutional reforms.

First, the investigative capacity of law enforcement agencies should be strengthened through specialized training, adequate manpower and access to modern equipment. Investigators must be equipped with the skills and resources necessary to conduct thorough investigations and manage evidence effectively. Secondly, the progress of investigations must be monitored more effectively. Existing legal requirements concerning the completion of investigations should be applied consistently, with appropriate scrutiny of cases that remain pending beyond the prescribed or reasonably expected period. Senior police officials and prosecutors should regularly review pending cases, identify the causes of delay and ensure that avoidable delays are addressed. Where investigations exceed the prescribed timeframe, responsible officials should be required to provide satisfactory explanations. Such oversight is essential to ensure that statutory requirements are enforced rather than remaining merely formal obligations. Thirdly, strengthening forensic infrastructure through adequate funding, modern equipment and specialized training is essential to ensure the timely and accurate analysis of evidence. Clear procedures for collecting, transporting, storing and documenting samples would further protect the integrity of evidence. Reliable forensic services would not only strengthen prosecutions but also help prevent wrongful convictions arising from unreliable or mishandled evidence.

Finally, effective accountability mechanisms must be established to address negligence and unjustified delays in criminal investigations. Officials responsible for such failures should be subject to transparent scrutiny and appropriate disciplinary action in accordance with the law. However, accountability must distinguish between negligence and genuine operational difficulties. Prosecutors should also exercise greater oversight to identify evidentiary shortcomings and ensure that cases are adequately prepared for trial.

The administration of criminal justice is a continuous process extending from the initial investigation to the final adjudication. Its effectiveness depends on the proper functioning of every stage. Although judicial delays remain a significant concern, the shortcomings in pre-trial proceedings require equally serious consideration. Effective investigations, the proper preservation of evidence and the timely examination of witnesses are fundamental requirements for ensuring a fair, efficient and credible criminal justice system.

Addressing delays in criminal justice requires reform at every stage, from investigation to trial. Strengthening investigative capacity, ensuring accountability and improving institutional coordination are essential to this process. Ultimately, a justice system can fulfil its purpose only when every case is handled fairly, efficiently and without undue delay.